Find a Lawyer

MESSRS BILZ (PVT.) LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MULTAN

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 50 (4A) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reduction of Income Taxes at Source Identifying the names of the parties through a notice notice for advance income tax collection In the failure notice to which the supply was made, Assisi made ten payments during the year 1995 for which income was not deducted at source, the amount of the payments was mentioned in the notice but the withholding tax column indicated. That the tax was not deducted and there was no reason. In spite of having the appropriate opportunity before the Income Tax Authorities, it was offered by him, no particulars were made regarding the deduction of the tax effect where notice to the investigator. / Knowing that taxes have to be deducted from the above mentioned category. Section 50 (4A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and even the Assisi itself failed to fulfill its obligation. On non-recovery, the Assessee was regarded as the default Assisi with which to supply the tax from the parties. The Assessing Officer was not obliged to identify the names of the parties to whom the supply was made because the record was maintained by the assessee, and it was his duty to maintain the record and state that Subsidy provides these items to the assessee who failed to deduct the tax under section 50 (4A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Why, when there was not deducted from the income tax department stakeholders to guess the Income Tax Ordinance read with section 86 of the Income Tax meaning of this default and evaluation justifiably Ltd divorce advocates from Sheikhupura lawyer