Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes
Or unlock 10 direct numbers for Rs 1,000

MUNIR AHMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TOBA TEK SINGH


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Art: 199 Constitution subpoena The FIR was passed by the Inquiry Scope Police to investigate any crime therein, and the High Court would not seek to restrain or prevent police duty in such a premature phase. The criminal case officer and not the High Court on the apparent wrongdoing of the allegations in the FIR. The question is whether the allegations made by the complainant in the FIR were factually correct or not necessarily the fact that an inquiry could not be conducted in the summary of the witnesses. Proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Haripur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Explore

Platform

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms Privacy Policy Refund Policy Delivery Policy Made in Pakistan 🇵🇰
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.