Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus GHULAM ABBAS

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, Sections 15 and 21 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), II, R2 (3), VI, R17 and O XXIII, R1 (1) ) The plaintiff, having relinquished such relief for pre-discrimination and declaration, filed suit claiming that it was claimed that she owned half of the suit land because she was renting a rent. The tenant is the tenant and leaves the part of the remaining share as the shareholder / owner. The state trial court ruled in this case, but the appellate court originally dismissed the case because it was not competent to prosecute at the same time, the plaintiff prayed that it was before Abandons the arrest claim and wants to sue for declaration only, but defendants contend that this cannot be done in the final stage. Valdetti can relinquish and retain any other kind of relief claimed by the plaintiff, and such practice does not change the nature of the case. In the Appellate Court of the plaintiff, the plaintiff did not give his finding on certain matters, on which the matter was remanded for writing a decision on these matters. ask a advocate free from Gujrat lawyer