Find a Lawyer

MST. ZOHRA BEGUM versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LAHORE

OI, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Eliminating the Required Parties Respondents filed a petition before the Trial Court to remove their names from the case because they were not necessary, the Trial Trial Court appealed. Dismissed, but the appellate court allowed the names of the defendants and defendants to be revoked against the order where the appellate court did not publicize the arguments of the trial court and decided only on the allegations and speculations. What, in the present case, was it in the interest of the parties that respondents and respondents need to avoid litigation? The appropriate party order was set aside by the appellate court and allowed for a trial court constitutional petition immigration advocates phone number from Akhora Khattak lawyer