MST. ZOHRA BEGUM versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LAHORE
OI, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Eliminating the Required Parties Respondents filed a petition before the Trial Court to remove their names from the case because they were not necessary, the Trial Trial Court appealed. Dismissed, but the appellate court allowed the names of the defendants and defendants to be revoked against the order where the appellate court did not publicize the arguments of the trial court and decided only on the allegations and speculations. What, in the present case, was it in the interest of the parties that respondents and respondents need to avoid litigation? The appropriate party order was set aside by the appellate court and allowed for a trial court constitutional petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
