Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD SARDAR

To comply with the provisions of Section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, for the absence of notice in the pre-discrimination case and the petitioner's court. Under section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, in accordance with the express provisions of section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, it failed to present such notice on record for the timely performance of the student. Well, the two courts are down at the same time. The case and the appeal were dismissed that the pool raised by the primer had failed to prove to Ashdia Palia that the provisions of section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 were substantially justified. And especially after pleading in the Plaintiff, it was the forecaster's duty to prove the same thing in the evidence; both the courts, through proper and detailed analysis and definition of the evidence, found that the Hon'ble Punjab Pre-Emission Act, Failure to give notice to the minor and the accused under Section 13 (3) of 1991, the act of compliance was in fact not in compliance with the express provisions of the law and provided no way out. had gone. Proposed umpire high court refuses to interfere with conclusions of fact through lower courts female advocates from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer