AJMAL TUFAIL versus THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Sindh Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 4 (1) (b) (iii), (iv) and 4 (2) dismissal and dismissal of employment and effect were notified to the Government employee. That he is bound to pay a fine. Termination of employment, but dismissal of employment rather than dismissal from employment, although dismissal and dismissal of employment, in view of R4 (2) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1973. , The dismissal penalty was far more severe than the dismissal from the service. According to R4 (2) of the Rules, 1973 will not result in the termination of employment, but the termination of employment will result in the termination of the job, in the event of a government employee being placed on a show cause notice as well as the final show cause notice. Was not in line with the recommended penalty
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jamshoro lawyer