Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR SANGI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, SERVICE AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 24 Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1974, R9 (c) Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975), Rear 10 and 12 (b) Seniority Intelligence A civil servant was initially appointed as a police sub-inspector at the prosecution branch in 1976 and then posted to the Anti-Corruption Establishment in 1982 and promoted as an inspector, but was sent back home, In 1990, a civil servant was permanently placed under the authority of the Anti-Corruption Establishment and the Chief Minister ordered in 1976. Sindh Police execution civil servants from the date of their initial appointment as inspector in the branch (probation, certification and seniority) Rules 1979 under the seniority assigned R 12 (B). The fact was formally informed by the Chief Secretary that there was a notification order of seniority issued by the authorized authority, which could not be snatched up by any subsidiary agency, especially any protest from the concerned department. Neither was nor was there any notification against the government employees that had been finalized and was not open to attack that the anti-notification government employees were issued without notice, canceled. Because the competent authority didn't have to understand that. Counsel for officers to be affected by an order may provoke opposition from public servants against the said order and it is challenged in the proper forum which has not been done. online advocate from Lodhran lawyer