Find a Lawyer

SYED AFTAB HAIDER versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 2 (b) and 24 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Promotion, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R12 (a) Determine sanitary appeal before service Appellate Tribunal Civil Servant, who had served in the Department of Communications and Construction, was requested by the Minister for Education to dismiss the Department of Education, Engineering Works, Department of Education, and was transferred by the Directorate of Engineering. Posted in Works. The appellant of the Department of Education chose the permanent integration of the Department of Communications and after completing the Department of Communications and Works, a notification was issued by the Sindh Government Employees (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975 R12 (a). Allowed to take advantage of As a department, and as long as he continued to be absorbed in the Department of Education (Department Transfer) notification, he did not enjoy the status of a public servant because he did not code according to the definition of a government employee. Was, as stated in the CL, C (C) as a civil servant, (C) was a deputationist, Section 2 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, and at that time was suppressed if R 12 (a)) was employed. Could not be inserted, as indicated by the Government Employee Notification under which the Appellant was permanently transferred to the Directorate of Engineering Work rather than transferred. , Was permanently absorbed into the Department of Education and with R 12 (was allowed a) the benefit, was not guaranteed by law. Because of the influence of the appellant in the education department due to political influence, top civil advocates from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer