Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD

Proof of Evidence Act 1872 Section 68 of the Evidence (10 of 1984), Article Constitution79 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Procedure for proof of document denied controversy for the reasons for the facts of sale agreement by the courts. was done. All the courts below decided this case in favor of the applicant while executing the sale process in favor of the respondents and it was stated that this document was not proved in accordance with the provisions of Article 79 of the Convention of 1984 was done. The decisions of the courts below were the result of misleading evidence that the sale of the legality in question was made before the declaration of the testimony of the law, 1984, therefore, its execution was proved in light of the provisions of section 68. What was to go The Evidence Act, 1872, and this law is not under Article 79 of the Evidence Act, the execution of the sale in 1984 was proved in the light of the statement of a minor witness and the testimony of the witness was not subject to any criticism and The effect cannot be represented by the applicant's ipse dixit. The decisions made by the courts below the Supreme Court did not refuse to read any false news or evidence. The leave to appeal with the decisions by the courts below was denied pakistani advocates Jamrud Road lawyer