Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus MST. WALAYAT KHATOON

Section 4 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 44 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), necessitated the easement of the permanent injunction, the court below the plaintiff in grant of facts The ruling has called for a ban to ban it. Defendant prevented the closure of the route used by him. The plaintiff claimed that it was a common thoroughfare while defendant alleged that the passage was his exclusive property, and the trial court ruled in this case. Was heard and upheld by the appellate court. The defendant's High Court position was that the plaintiff had to prove that he had the right to an easement before success in the trial. The fact was discovered that the passage was not part of the defendant's property and was being used. Since the plaintiff was the only means of passing and reaching her home, it was established to ease the need. The following court was not subject to any legal weakness. The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the decision. And the court denied the appeal advocate for immigration from Shamsabad lawyer