Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSADAQ KH. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVEENGINEER versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN RAO

Rules of the Central Engineering Service (Class I) 1951 R 21 [as amended 10 10 1984 and 12 5 1988] Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) appealed to the service tribunal to propagate the applicant's argument that the service tribunal was banned over time because the representation on 23 February 1992 was unannounced for more than 120 days and Defendant did not request the tribunal's jurisdiction on time, but resolved to seek an answer on 10 7 1994, rejecting his representation, which in time for the tiling of the appeal. He will not. Because of the failure to qualify the initial promotion to the Department Examination, the Central Engineering Service violated the Class I Rule, which was amended in 10 10 1984, so it was B17 as an Assistant Executive Engineer. I was not eligible for further development. The Service Rules did not facilitate the promotion of Assistant Engineer B 16 to the position of Assistant Executive Engineer B 17 in 1984, but the amendments to the Service Rules 12 5 1988 include provisions for such promotion that the Department The exams are about implementation. 10 of which will not be possible and disappointing since 1984. Since the Service Rules were amended in the year 10, 1984, such advertisement was not made, so the service tribunal found it wrong to conclude the error and that the service tribunal did not consider the effect of quota system. Appeal was granted to appeal the matter famous lower court advocate from Chaghi lawyer