ASIM SHAHZAD versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED
Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance 1997 Section 12 Pre-order, Placing the Service at the wrong address The plaintiff filed two addresses, both addresses were not the same. The loan agreement was executed at the address given to the lender, the lender did not appear before the Banking Court and in this case an application was made to reject the former party order which was rejected by the Banking Court. Had done. Addresses given in the simplicity could not be taken for the appropriate services on the loan, the banking court erroneously dismissed the application, which allowed the lender to reject the banking court's earlier decision and order. Was. Apply for leave to defend the proceedings and case and get the case remanded to the Banking Court for judgment, after which the appeal is allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
