DUR MUHAMMAD SHAH versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Offenses for adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Corollary Code (XLV of 1860), Section 338A bail, satisfying delay in filing FIR Was described by the man who was allegedly charged. At the age of 60, according to a medical examination, he could not be called ill or diseased because his strong witness was a self-complaining victim / victim who had no reason to falsely implicate the accused and his version. The medical examination given to the FIR was fully supported by the complaint of the lady doctor who complained that she had complained that her injuries were found on the complainant's person and that her injuries And the abortions were because of the violence committed during the rape and there were reasonable grounds for contacting him, charged with the offense that led to the prohibition clause of section 497, the CCPC bail. The request for was thrown out of circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Haroonabad lawyer
