MESSRS AGRO FOOD LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 6 Claims against a loss insurance company in a business recovering from a bank loan were acknowledged by the bank in their request to appear and defend against the holiday, saying that they had to suffer severe flooding. The trial court ruled that in favor of the bank plaintiffs raised by the defendants, it was the responsibility of the bank to insure the insurance company, as the scheme was directed by the bank. Defendants sued for claims that were provoked by the insurance company's assertion of their claim. Filed refused to take action against the insurer for trial may treat them, because the defendants had suffered damage, flood agreement will not free them from responsibility. In appearing for leave and applying for defense, the defendants were responsible for the damage to the plan and the bank had the responsibility to settle this claim with the insurance company, whose responsibility was denied by the Bank High Court's intervention by the banking tribunal. Yes, the appeal was dismissed under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
