AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MALIK IFTIKHAR AHMED
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 6 and 9 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 20 Appeal Concession Scheme, Withdrawal of error of fact to be deposited by the bank as a full and final payment borrower to the lender. Was released. The demand was submitted to the Bank Banking Court under the letter, in the light of the amount deposited under the letter, a decree was issued in favor of the bank player that the letter was in fact a mistake. Was issued to the borrower, therefore, was bound to keep the judgment and decree passed by the banking court separate. Validate Bank itself offered to deposit some money to the borrower, to which the remaining amount would be waived. After submitting the required amount, the borrower accepted the offer, under such a contract law. Implementation came into force, after depositing the required amount and accepting the offer terms by the borrower, the bank had no lawful authority to separately recover the terms of the offer, All the intentions and motives which were implemented and the order of the Judge and the banking court in accordance with the law, the High Court intervened. Refused to be addicted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
