Find a Lawyer

CH. ZULFIQAR ALI versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 14 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898) Section 540 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 133 (2) Requesting Record of Illegal Assistance Record and Returning Witness for Cross Inspection Trial Court Required The exclusion of the request is primarily to record witnesses who record the cross for cross-examination mainly because the documents referenced by the applicants were not relied upon, therefore, from the witnesses. No question can be asked, nor can it be asked to present the above record. The validity of Article 133 (2) of the Law Shahadat, 1984, shows that the scope of the cross examination was not limited to the facts that the Chief Justice of Railway Examination in a witness examination stated that he or she or the party Was a valuable right granted by the legislature. The defendant was entitled to examine the witness's testimony to include facts in support of the accused accused of challenging the authenticity of the witness, even though the facts could not have anything to do with the defendant's defense of the witness's testimony. He testified in his cross-examination that the only prerequisite was that it should be related to the relevant facts. The relevant facts would be related to any facts / circumstances which were related to the prosecution's case or to the accused Prima facie. The source defense will be concerned that disclosure of the accused's income records to legal sources will be the case. The load will be the most important reason to run a good move if the prosecution case. Section 14 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 criminal advocate from Ubaro lawyer