HAQ NAWAZ versus THE STATE
The guarantee grant of Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 337F (iii) / 337F (v) / 34/379 / 411FIR revealed that the accused had struck 30 bore with a pistol. The nose of the police investigation found that the accused was initially not equipped with a weapon and had taken the gun of his co-accused, no weapon was recovered from the suspect during the investigation. I was not attracted to him. The prohibition clause of section (1) of section 497, the Additional Sessions Judge of the PC, observed in its unidentified order that the allegations against the accused had attracted the provisions of section 337 (iii), PPC, but the F An IR or apparently invoice was not included. The accused had nothing to do with the motive established in the FIR; the trial court had already granted bail to the two accused accused of taking part in the incident. The inquiry was completed. Was already presented after The case, on the demand of the further inquiry of the accused accused, his bail was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kala Shah Kaku lawyer
