Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 / evidence 34 The accused was charged with physical remand for about twenty days, but nothing was recovered from them due to darkness and cold overnight, and late at night, the prosecution's witnesses testified. Complaints were not made at the place of presence. The witness was Mutofi's real brother and he has improved his statements, but said that the improvement did not improve the prosecution's case. Prosecutors tried to change the time of the incident in a desperate attempt to become eyewitnesses, post-mortem reports made it clear that the cause of the death was not known, and according to the post-mortem doctor, There could have been a death, none of the post-mortem medical officers had said that the deceased was due to medical evidence involving three doctors due to suffocation or choking. There were two specialists, completely dismissed by the prosecutor's story in New Moti, the case was set up during the trial in the FIR, and the prosecution witness, who introduced a new motive that deviates from the stated purpose in the FIR. Was very weak in the FIR, could not provide any explanation for the deviation, substantially after the prosecution's witness time, presented a new motive that seemed more serious and the prosecution The witnesses had completely failed to prove this new purpose, even proving its motives themselves. I can not say a suspect was taken to effect recovery, a prosecution witness said. Swearing before the trial court inheritance advocates near Gujar Khan lawyer