Find a Lawyer

SAJID ULLAH versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34/109 Testimony of Evidence FIR immediately-filed prosecution witnesses dismissed that one of the accused had sustained two wounds to the victim's arm, but only one was found to be right. Was a front-facing muscle. The co-accused is the real brother of the main accused, who was declared four injured. The possibility of false involvement of the co-accused cannot be ruled out. Both witnesses did not have any previous hostility against the accused. The home of one of the prosecution witnesses and the other of the prosecution's witnesses was reported in the presence of the witness. The presence of witnesses at the time and place of the witness's presence was natural, both said that no previous hostility was found by the accused electric light when the witnesses were located. Relevant time was shown not only in the site plan, but also in the FIR mentioning parties that knew each other. False identification, the possibility of a false suspect being trapped, cannot be ruled out, even though the two accused were recovered, but recovery from the co-accused revealed that there was no help in his recovery prosecution case. ? Since this was only contradictory evidence, the court had to see if the Aculer account was supported by the medical evidence or not. There was no case of false accusation against the accused as there was slight contradiction with the medical evidence. Was done Such incidents are always the time between the post-mortem and injuries, the length of time the incident occurred when the witness's medical relationship with the victim was confirmed. online advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer