SAJID-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution witnesses shows that the accused caught the deceased by her hair and dumped her in the canal and died, post mortem of the deceased's body, according to statements of the prosecution witnesses. And was subjected to a doctor. Even his death was due to drowning, until medical evidence confirmed the ocular account presented by the prosecution's witnesses to which the FIR was immediately filed and both the complainant and the eyewitness Testified the prosecution's version, both witnesses were subjected to lengthy investigations, but the prosecution version, without success, proved not only by oral evidence, but also by medical evidence, that the trial trial court The accused was truly punished and sentenced and the trial decision may be granted according to law, Interruption of appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Dir lawyer
