Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus THE STATE

Definition of sections 11, 10 (4) and 10 (3) of the evidence was reasonably explained by the complainant's delay of 15/16 days in filing the FIR and this case was not fatal in the prosecution's case. The negative report of the Chemical Examiner was imposed on the accused, as the victim was a married woman and mother of two children, and even without medical report, photographs were made by the accused, to commit adultery. There was enough evidence. The accused had committed adultery by the accused along with the victim and also took pictures to blackmail her in the future, which was a very immoral act. It was not reported that the two accused had committed adultery at the same time and taking photographs said that the photo did not indicate that they were both of the accused taken on the same day and time and in this connection. The victims were not substantiated by any other independent evidence under the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Collection 10 (4) was transferred under section 10 (3) as punishment for criminals and the accused was at his death. Under Section 11 of the Ten Year RI Ordinance, every conviction of the accused was reduced to ten years and in penalties both provisions were ordered to run in accordance with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC. immigration advocates from Daulat Pur lawyer