NAIK MUHAMMAD versus S.H.O.
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Detention Corps The applicant requested the recovery of claims stating that a detainee had been married to her and another brother. His father had submitted copies of the FIR against him under Section 11 against the applicant. Copies of the Order of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 were also presented to the court regarding the statements made in both detention under section 164 under, the PC High Court directed that it be Dates should be presented in court on a specific date. That the court should convince itself that the alleged statement was voluntarily given by detainees and that they themselves denied Nica petitioner and his brother, but despite the instruction, the petition was not presented to the court. The shelters were sheltered to avoid technical preparations. Detainees in court respondents once again directed the High Court to present the evidence in court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Issa Khel lawyer
