Find a Lawyer

AFRAZ AKBAR versus THE STATE

Appreciating the evidence of Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c), although there was no enmity or personal reasons for the accused's false intervention in this case from the eyewitness testimony of the deceased, the accused filed under Section 342, CRPC. An alternative version was not presented in my statement. Evidence of the motions and disclosures made by the accused in his illegal confession was immediately on record, resulting in the least possible chance of being replaced by the deceased, however innocent. The dam was not a man of moral character and was a catalyst for inciting the Commission. The perpetrator of the crime should be deeply disturbed. The victim's back chest was accused of hitting a deadly knife; he did not act in a barbaric manner; he then committed illicit relations with his wife. Failure to stop building. There was an accepted field for the sanction of lesser convictions than questions of family honor on provocation Section 2302 (b), p: pc was consequently changed to section 2302 (c), PPC and section life382. B, with the benefit of the CRPC, his life sentence was limited to nine years. lawer from fb area from Theing Jattan More lawyer