Named the Section 5 Special Relief Act (of 1877), the section 42 Suitable Benevolent Fund and the Group Insurance Inheritance Rights (Turkey), the scope securities certificate status was obtained in favor of the widow, but benefits of other services. The trial court ruling for the trial included other legal heirs of the late and the decree passed by the trial court was upheld by the lower appellate court, because the nomination had no right to receive more money than it deserved. Under the shares, the nominee does not have the legal right to inherit. The sole duty of the nominees, if any, to obtain their respective shares was to collect the money from all the legal heirs who are entitled to receive the gift or the will of the nominee under the law for the designated nomination. , Therefore, cannot be excluded from the other legacy of the nominee, who was entitled to a succession law applicable to the burial provisions of section 5 of the Provident Funds Act, 1925, Is not the money included in the honorees, nor is he declared his owner, he was given the right to receive the money and no one else says hi. This court refused to interfere with the lower appellate court's decision, as there was no misreading or misreading of evidence or any illegal thing or any material misconduct. An error or defect can be identified The review was rejected in circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
