Find a Lawyer

FAZAL RAHIM versus FAQIR KHAN

Section 13 pre-trial litigation, the performance of the statements of the defendant's witnesses is recorded after four years of the performance of the plea agreement The effect of the non-material contradictions in the statements of such witnesses is to throw the pre-emptor on the technicality only. Would not be in favor of The material High Controversy or Minor Contradiction / Fault in such statements was not denied by the trial court's outdated and improper proceedings of the trial court, which could render the witnesses wrong or untrustworthy on the basis of minor inaccuracies or contradictions in their statements. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• MUNSIF SHAH v. PEPCO through Managing Director, Lahore 2013 PLC(CS) 223
• Mst. ZAHIDA v. KAKI KHAN 2013 YLR 223
• Mst. SIKANDAR JAHAN v. Mst. GHULAM ZAINAB 2013 CLC 228
• BAKHTZADA v. State 2013 YLR 230
• DAUD SONS INDUSTRY AND ARMOURY EMPLOYEES, PESHAWAR v. REGISTRAR TRADE UNION 2013 PLC 232
• SHAH RUKH v. State 2013 PCrLJ 237
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES, PESHAWAR v. PAKISTAN REFRIGERATION (PVT.) LTD., PESHAWAR 2013 PTD 240
• WAQIF KHAN v. NASRULLAH 2013 YLR 241

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes