Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed appreciated the evidence by filing an FIR with delay of about two hours. It can be safely held that the time was spent in negotiation and consultation, the complainant has made careful and dishonest improvement in his statement to strengthen the prosecutor's case, his statement has lost his credibility. The identity and significance of the incident ended on the eighth day of the incident without any explanation was presented to the victim's blood-stained chador, which caused severe suspicion to the police in the case of the prosecution, though the knife was then seized from the possession of the accused. The recovery was apparent, but since the weapon used was dagger, which was readily available in the market, He was not bleeding, so he could not help the prosecution, a minor witness said in his cross-examination that the statement was recorded by the investigating officer at the police station, while the investigating officer made the statement. That the statements were recorded on the spot, which expressed skepticism, the conduct of the prosecution witnesses indicated that the incident did not occur in his presence, and as described by the prosecutor. The incident was committed in the presence of the complainant, who was the brother of the deceased and the other prosecutor. The witness, who was also a relative of the deceased, but did not show any resistance, and did not show any power in any way from him, in order to force the accused into force, or To retrieve the deceased from the suspect, or to pursue the fallen suspect. Submitted by prosecution, at
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
