Section 4 324 / qq On the day of the murder, the brother-in-law appreciated the evidence, no doubt he sustained the wounds of the fire, but said that the injuries only indicated his presence and that he Their credibility and truth do not attest, though there was no proof, but only the first reflection of the place. The one who offered a theoretical view of the crime and this is very important evidence, cannot be ignored. Nowhere in the site plan does it mention that blood was recovered from the scene of the incident, no expense pills were recovered from the scene, which showed that the version of the site plan was not supported by the prosecution. The complainant received a firearm wound on the left side of his knee. One of the shots on the record that was on the non-vital part of the body, the prosecutor's witness received a left-sided wrist injury on the left thigh and also did not give the doctor the nature of the injury to his right knee, Prosecutor's witnesses did not present Medico legal reports to prove the prosecution, the doctor's negligence, demonstrated the prosecutor's economic forces, who made false allegations and required negative indications against the prosecutor. Yes, the story presented by the prosecution was not with the help of the site plan and the medical. The evidence was submitted by the forensic science laboratory report as evidence of prosecution, but the evidence cannot be relied upon for reasons that would lead to extraordinary delays in sending weapons for empty crime cases and analysis. Neither the prophet Cavus was specified
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
