XLI, R 31 Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 42 suit for adjudication of lower appellate court point in the case, the plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit land in the non-judgment decision and in favor of the plaintiff A certified multi-change order was issued in favor of the plaintiffs through the trial, but the lower appellate court dismissed the plea raised by the plaintiffs that the decision by the lower appellate court was O XLI, Rule, 31, c. The PC's accuracy was not in accordance with the provisions of the lower appellate court, dismissing it as a result. The trial court was under the legal obligation to decide the dispute by order XLI, while Roll 31 CPC was about the age of a shopkeeper at the time of dispute sale and the same was withheld. All energy was wasted on payment or non-payment of consideration for sale, which was not indicated in this case, or disputes between the parties in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the review, decision and decision put aside. Reverse Appellate Court granted and remanded the decision to appeal
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
