Article 9 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for possession of immovable property, determination of boundary documents The purpose of the components to be considered by the court and the purpose of Section 9, Special Relief Act, 1877 suit property were joint and several partners The owners were listed in the Revenue Record of 1969, the Revenue Record of 1993 was not kept in the file in 1991, especially since the Gurdwara land will play a crucial role in determining the facts of the case. The matter cannot be decided without bringing such important evidence on record. No relief can be granted under section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, without fulfilling the necessary components, the question of whether the title of the plaintiff or defendant can be raised. In this case, no consideration has been given, only possession of the underground land before the encashment will be considered as the deciding factor in granting relief in such case, such possession against the real owner of the property. Can be avoided. The question of ownership was not Germany for the delivery of Section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877. The summary of such provision was that the plaintiff was listed as co-owner of the suit property despite no right to appeal but He had failed to seize it within six months before the institution suit, with reliable and authentic documentary evidence. The revenue record must be brought on file for the administration of justice. No authentic credible and up-to-date copies of measles and kidnappings were displayed on the record; the impugned verdicts passed by the courts invalidated the jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
