Section 302 (b) Definition of Defective Evidence Testimony Benefits of Suspicion The parties were very closely related to each other in the incident reporting to the police for about five to five hours, in the FIR and in the witness statements before Was not specified. The prosecution relied on the injured victim's statement as a declaration of death, which did not meet the basic requirements declared as a deceased declaration and was rejected by the trial court on the alleged incident. The exact reasoning of the conviction was not beyond the reasonable doubt, and the facts mentioned in the FIR were not true, and the names of the eyewitnesses were not listed in the FIR, the prosecutor was able to prove the most important aspect of the case to any independent person. Had failed to deliver, the empty bottle and the wand were reportedly recovered from the spot, but were not erased The chemicals were sent to the laboratory for chemical analysis to determine the use of oil, the recovery of an empty bottle and stick, said no indication that even a permanent witness prosecution failed to prove the motive. That no oral or documentary evidence was presented for the facts of the joint ownership in the house, the matter was not investigated in accordance with the section required under Section 74, AA, CRPC Was. Undeterred, the integrity of the prosecution's star witnesses was very skeptical that the incident did not take place in the manner and manner in which the complainant stated in the FIR, and later , He stated in his court statement, which caused serious doubt
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
