Section 18 Land Compensation, Landlord's Complaint The landlord's complaint was that the referee judges relied on the appraisal table prepared by the Deputy Commissioner and did not correct their lands according to the market value on which they were based. However, the referee judge held that the property was valued for stamp duty and other taxes payable and was never intended for compensation purposes. The referee's court was not in accordance with the legal and equitable criteria that were formulated under the laws and wisdom of the Supreme Court, the only available documentation of compensation for proper review, which resulted in equal compensation, Under it was the local census report, which proposed a compensation of Rs 250,000 per marl, which looks real, legal, reasonable, fair and equitable in terms of current growth trends. Land prices had future potential in the acquired land, and this was the situation in the middle city as well as the High Court on the roadside, which was rejected by the referee and approved by landlords for $ 200 each. Apart from the compensation of land acquired in the amount of Rs. Accordingly the appeal was allowed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
