SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT versus PERVAIZ IQBAL
Section 18 legal evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 Arbitration Arbitration Clause for the restoration of money, estoppel, the applicant was the principle contractor and in consequence of the breach of the contract in connection with the completion of the contract A lawsuit was filed for It was claimed by the authorities in favor of the plaintiff that at the time of the clearance, the claimant did not present the demand certificate and it contained a mediation clause which he did not seek legality, nor the plaintiff. The authorities had no help in prosecuting because there was no mention of any waiver of the accusation, nor was there any legal backing behind which the plaintiff could claim his right to arbitration clause. And the authorities themselves could send the matter to the arbitrator, who was their own officer, but the authorities were able to resolve the dispute through arbitration. Don't hesitate to refer the plaintiff instead. H Court of Court, the authorities could have directed him to go to arbitration or he could have referred the matter to arbitration, the authorities were stopped to raise his request. And the plaintiff could not be invalid because there was no benefit to the arbitration clause. As for the department's claim of accusation of accusation, his claims for such accusations were not disputed by the authorities and, on technical grounds, his claim was denied, which was denied and resisted on a legal basis. Was not, the plaintiff was entitled to the injunction in his favor and the trial court did not take any unlawful action in deciding his suit. The trial court's decision was reasonably justified and right
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
