Section 7 (h) Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 14 Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Section 5 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 40 Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), Section 103 Evidence of the act Terrorism, evidence of possessing illegal weapons, making or possessing ammunition under suspicious circumstances, the trial court found the accused under Section 14 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 under the Explosives Act 1908 and Anti-Terrorism. Under Section 7 (h) of the Act 1997, the accused was convicted and sentenced. Provided by the accused persons, which led to the discovery of weapons, ammunition and explosives, they came within the scope of section 40 of the testimony of the law, 1984 section 103, CRPC was not present in the matter. Applicable to, because no search was made by the police officers, but it was the accused persons who had recovered the weapons, ammunition and explosives. The police witnesses were good witnesses and if any of their testimony. If the variable remains, it can be depended on. He was charged with compensation, ill-will and personal injury. The Marginal Witness (police officer) and the investigating officer confirmed the prosecution's version and remained steadfast during their investigation and were free of any kind. The possibility of exploitation cannot be created. Their fact weapons experts confirmed that the recovered weapons were in the works were not enough contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses to raise suspicion about the involvement and crime of the accused. The prosecution proved the fact of recovery on the basis of evidence of assurance. The accused was acquitted accordingly against the conviction
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
