GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA versus MST. ZUBAIDA
Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Articles 47, 115 and OXXI, R 10 suits that were not approved under the influence filed in the decree to the extent of restoration of service in this case Was made but the plaintiff while requesting the recovery of the previous benefits for execution of the decree, refused to recover the previous benefits as the claim was not made but the lower appellate court only served the plaintiff of the same suit in service. Claims to be restored, however, were granted relief by the trial court, with respect to providing benefits back for the duration of the intervention. I did not comply with the request because it was not requested. The court that executes it cannot go after it and does not allow its authenticity to be denied when a special request was not made by a provocative person. Individual, the court seizing the case should not allow the same High Court the jurisdiction to review, the order passed by the lower appellate C was set aside. ust Revision request allowed in circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
