Find a Lawyer

SAID-UL-HAQ versus JANAS KHAN

In the case of preliminary appointment of section 13, the petitioner and the plaintiff did not find mention of the applicant's application by the plaintiff to the plaintiff that he knew of the sale of the case by his informant in the court and in the presence of the plaintiff. Demanded from cross-examination that he sat in his own seat, where he acted as an informant that informed the plaintiff about selling the suit while he was with another lawyer. Was seated and failed to dismiss the case of the student society. Under the circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• MADAD KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 333
• MALANG SHAH v. State 2013 MLD 334
• ASAL JANA v. State 2013 MLD 342
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD. v. AZHAR ALI BABAR 2013 PLC 345
• MIRZAMAN v. MUHAMMAD AJMAL HUSSAIN 2013 YLR 357
• WALI KHAN v. WAHEED GHANI KHAN 2013 MLD 360
• Syed NOOR-UD-DIN SHAH v. BASHIR HUSSAIN 2013 CLC 361
• FAZAL AKBAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 369

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tarbela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes