Section 2 (2 (b) Qatil-e-Adm) filed the testimony of the evidence within four hours. The location of the incident was located in a remote area 50?1? km away from the police station with no better traffic. The delay in presenting the facility report, in the circumstances, was of no importance to the statement of the witnesses of the complainant and the prosecution, agreeing on material points, on the occasion of the presence, they were told that the witnesses were present. Deposed and confirmed the prosecution's version, he remained steadfast and his truth could not be shaken, the witnesses' names and the accused were accused of firing. The role of the accused was mentioned, which received the support of medical evidence, which backed the account of the accused known to the complainant, which is known to the complainant. There was no question of misidentifying witnesses, even though they were interrelated but there was no basis for abandoning the relationship. Their evidence was an interesting testimony aimed at falsifying a person. The accused was intended to be implicated, but the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was not found fraudulent and they had no intention of making any false accusation. There is no chance of that past animosity between close relatives killed Scott Free will and will substitute for the real culprit committing a crime and an innocent person to death. Eyewitnesses accuse the accused in their statements, which are inconsistent and did not constitute a post-mortem failure. Prosecution Case Any changes to the site plan and a
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
