Statutes, 42, & ov & ov Possession of immovable property, Permanent injunction and Permanent trial for possession have been documented by the courts Review of the documentary evidence showed that the plaintiff was the owner of the suit while the defendants, even though the complainant rented And the plaintiffs substantiate their claim. Strong evidence, while the evidence presented by the defendants was not based on proper definition of the evidence of solid, strong or credible courts, and a well-established review was rejected.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013