Sections 9 (c) and 25 intoxicant evidence allegedly tried to smuggle 4947 kilograms of hashish, which was hidden in the body of a truck, the driver of the accused truck, is being heard in the trial. The accused was convicted under Section 9. C) The legal status of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997, all the prosecution witnesses / anti-narcotics force officials agreed fully on all aspects of the case and the defense did not identify any material contradiction in its statements, He was not charged with any hostility, unlawful desire or animosity. The huge amount of 4947 kilograms of evidence against the prosecution witnesses could not be proved without greasy animosity, the non-participation of the private witnesses did not matter, because with the application of section 103, the CCP was charged under section 25. Was deleted The prosecution witnesses of the Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, were members of the raiding party. The witnesses and their testimony could not be excluded solely on the basis that they were employees of the Anti-Narcotics Force Report, which reports the forensic science laboratory reported. The alleged substance was marijuana The accused failed to prove that he was not driving the truck during the raid, the prosecution had succeeded. Prosecutors successfully reached the home to prove that the truck was under the control of the suspect at the time of his arrest and that he was sitting in the driving seat.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
