Section 8, 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115, in the case of cross-examination of the suit, declaration and injunction, the plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit property and demanded the recovery of the possession. , While the contentious defendants also filed the case in the trial court. The decree was passed by a unanimous decision in favor of the plaintiff and the case filed by the lower appellate court was dismissed and both the cases were partially dismissed, the trial court legally completed the cases in both countries. Discussed and passed the judgment in favor of the right. The plaintiff and the local appellate court were not entitled to a stay of the order up to a 10-march limit in the plaintiff and dismissal case and such findings were not supported by the credible evidence available on record, the lower appellate court hanged The evidence in relation to is not properly appreciated. Reversing the trial court's decision reversing the trial court's finding in connection with the dismissal of the defendant's lawsuit filed in favor of the plaintiff and in favor of the plaintiff's High Court in dealing with illegal and material misconduct And accordingly the review was allowed by the lower appellate court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
