Find a Lawyer

PESCO versus UMER GUL

The Su 42 suit sought a declaration to the effect that the plaintiff had allowed the defendant / power company to pay all of its arrears and now nothing was allowed by it, as well as the suit. Permanent decision was made The record revealed that a single phase meter used for residential purpose could not be eaten. By the plaintiff's many units in a month as shown in the bill of the plaintiff for a particular month, it is unlikely that the plaintiff's section could be fitted or tampered with because the meter was located outside the plaintiff's home. It was The power company had also placed a mother on the plaintiff's meter which had become unrecognizable

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• The STATE through Advocate-General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar v. ATTAUR REHMAN 2013 MLD 899
• SHAHZEB KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 907
• Mst. PARVEEN BIBI v. State 2013 YLR 913
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. State 2013 PCrLJ 915
• LOCOMOTIVE FACTORY PAKISTAN, RAILWAYS v. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX, PESHAWAR 2013 PTD 924
• SHAHID MEHMOOD v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2013 YLR 930
• AMIR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 931
• MURAD ALI v. MUHAMMAD AMAN 2013 YLR 940

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

jobs for advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes