FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE
S9 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 497 bail, 1040 grams of marijuana recovery grant recovered huge quantities of drugs as a witness to the recovery of police officers, drawn from the sole possession of the accused recovery memo. The two policemen testified. There is no enmity with the accused regarding the false implications. Each case had its own circumstances and facts and in these specific circumstances, guarantees were granted and, except for the broad principles of the High Courts, no other case or case was brought and no decision was taken. Could have For the purpose of dealing with the bail application, the element came up with enough material in the prosecution record, which in the first case, linked the accused to the crime, in those cases was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Mehrab Pur lawyer