KHAN AKBAR versus MOHIB GUL
The Code of Civil Code, 1908, was amended under Section 115, Section 115 was jurisdictional, the CPC was arbitrary and the court would not interfere with Section 115, CPC, so as to remove any irregularities in the exercise of jurisdiction. But only if there is serious injustice or hardship. Intervention Section 115, CPC only applies to cases involving unlawful presumption, non-exercise or unlawful exercise of jurisdiction and cannot be invoked against the end of law or facts which the court may by no means The jurisdiction was not affected, if any, wrong, wrong or wrong decision could be about the judgment or law or any question, unless, of course, the decision did not include a matter of jurisdiction if the court , It had jurisdiction to decide one way or the other. The end of a law or fact can be adjusted accordingly if the court's decision was appropriate and appropriate, the court may be reluctant to intervene in the review. There may be some irregularities in its recording. The court will also not interfere where there has been a fair amount of justice between the parties and where the applicant sought asylum in the capacity or where the discretion was exercised properly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer