Find a Lawyer

ROSHAN DIN versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail, Approval of Further Inquiry Midnight Presence Identification of suspected suspects No overt act was assigned and they were only presented. Were. The statement of the prosecution witnesses at the time of the incident was controversial The prosecutor's position was that since the main accused had not been arrested yet, the arrested accused were not liable for exemption on bail even when reasonable suspicion arose in connection with the incident. happens. Regarding the fact / probability of the perpetrator or the prosecution of the crime and the evidence presented in support of the charge, the accused should not be denied the benefit of bail even better than the accused on bail. During the trial, the accused person was on trial for misconduct under Section 497 (2), CRPC granted bail for further investigation. ask a advocate free from Adda Shaiwala lawyer