BIBI AISHA versus ALI MUHAMMAD
Sections 114, 152 and O XLVII, Rr 1, 2 Revision on Decisions and Decisions Clerical Error Trial Court's jurisdiction was upheld and the trial court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to 1/5 of the shares. Which contains the words of everyone in the suit property. In the judgment and decree / 5th section omitted, on the judgment and order of the trial, the appellate court allowed the appeal filed by the plaintiff and dismissed the plaintiff's jurisdiction, dismissing the legal status. Was an academic and mathematical error which was not sufficiently violated by the trial court to correct such error, the CPC trial court rightly requested a review to correct the error. That was displayed on the face of the record. Since no appeal was a verdict and the judgment passed by the appellate court was set aside and these trial court persons were restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer