Find a Lawyer

IQBAL versus THE STATE

Section 3 (4) of the Northwest Frontier Province Pre-Emission Act (X of 1987), Section 13 of Swat filed in 1992 under the Civil Procedure (Special Provisions) Regulations, Provinces of the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas, 1975 The failure was rejected in 1995. On the basis that the plaintiff failed to make the students required under Section 13 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987, the suit was filed when the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1957, did not extend. Was done because the aforesaid Act was extended to the extent where the case was filed under the institution of suit regulation, which itself was a lawsuit that was being prosecuted and the procedure for civil cases The provisions of section 3 (4) stated that the rule specifically excluded the application of civil code of conduct, 1908 the question is whether the bridge Whether the anti-civil procedure was prepared according to the relevant provisions of the Code, the cases established under the PATA Regulation did not matter. But if the plaintiff did not mention the facts necessary to negotiate for the implementation of the entitlement, it is said that the cancellation of the plaintiff's case will not have effect, especially when the defendants in their written statement No such objection was raised. law firms from Fateh Jang lawyer