Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN versus S.H.O

Pakistan Constitution 1973 Sections 135 and 141 (5) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Article 33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Failure to draw a court order sheet, dispute regarding title to property during the division proceedings The Revenue Court ruled in the civil court's capacity but failed to draw the Dietary Sheet, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge and was dismissed on the ground that the appeal against the order was not filed. Filed an appeal with the Revenue Authorities instead of giving priority. Revision of the order of the Additional District Judge who refused to decide the matter because the trial court exercised jurisdiction because the legal status of the civil court was irregularly construed by the trial court which created the draw sheet. Did not intimidate illegal proceedings, the trial was seriously unsuccessful. It was an important jurisdiction in which any party and whetv wasted time would be wasted in the future. The trial court cannot refrain from exercising any jurisdiction within it where the trial court is a jurisdiction. The decree was bound to be drawn, irrespective of what the parties had, it would remain binding forever. Such duty on his behalf was so bound by the trial court that he was bound and would be bound to produce a permanent injunction even if the parties did not go anywhere to resolve their complaint. A district judge's decree was set. On one hand and in the circumstances constitutional application was allowed famous high court advocate from Ghizer lawyer