AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus JAVED ANWAR
Article 42 and Rules of Azad and Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1984, R 42 The application written by the civil service is adhered to the principles of restoration and restitution of the High Court. The TEVTA applied and the Deputy Director of the Respondent was approved for the post of Complaint stating that he was offered the project post rather than being appointed against the post of the respondent The respondent joined this post and When his return notification was issued at the end of the term, he challenged the aforesaid notification before the High Court, which was admitted for a regular hearing. Correct respondents accepted the term of office for a period of three years, and upon completion of their term, when the return of their parents began the deportation proceedings, they came forward to worry about the whole process. I had to dismiss the writ petition and respondent in this case as per the material brought to the record by the respondent writ petition principal and in this case the writ petition was rejected because it was devoid of any material for admission to the regular hearing. was not. If that fails, the writ petition may be rejected at an early stage.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
