Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus AMIR HANIF

Section 12 (2) Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), appeal of the Supreme Court suit for the specific performance of the section 42 agreement agreement, delayed termination agreement Keeping aside. The jurisdiction to set aside the settlement decision was dismissed simultaneously. The applicant participated in the proceedings of the case on 21-26 2006 and learned of the settlement through the alleged lawyer. The petition was barred by the courts from time to time to set aside the settlement order when due to the time restriction, due to negligence and negligence of the applicant the rights were imposed on the other party and hence no application. Cannot be given The appeal for the delay which led to his negligence was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015

• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. JAVED ANWAR 2015 PLC(CS) 354
• ABDUL LATIF KHAN v. NAZIRAN BEGUM 2015 YLR 427
• Syed NAZIR AHMED SHAH GILLANI v. Syeda NAZIA GILLANI 2015 MLD 443
• ALI HAIDER v. Syed MUHAMMAD ASGHAR SHAH 2015 YLR 511
• Mir MUHAMMAD FAREED v. RUKHSANA BIBI 2015 YLR 752
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. AHMED DIN 2015 MLD 864
• Mst. SHAZIA KOUSAR v. NISAR AHMED 2015 YLR 917
• MEHARBAN HUSSAIN v. ZAHIDA KAUSAR 2015 MLD 955

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2015 →

top civil advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes