Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ABID versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 42 Appeals to the Supreme Court Civil Service Advertising for Lecturer Positions The applicant believed that he was a migrant from Jammu and Kashmir settled in Pakistan, but the defendant was recommended against the quota of refugees settled in Pakistan and such recommendation was illegal, arbitrary and without legal legal authority. The information that came to the knowledge of the applicants during the approval of the writ petition was not challenged before the High Court; the proper way for the applicant was to challenge the said notification while filing the petition for modification of the writ petition or The challenge was to The same was done freely but no such approach was sought by the applicant to declare the recommendations made in favor of the respondents and his appointment order was issued without legal authority. The petitioner did not challenge the order of appointment of the respondent in the writ petition. If the same e-court had not been taken in the lower forum before the Supreme Court then it could not have been done for the first time in the Supreme Court when the petitioner applied. Applicant had to amend the writ petition or the dirty notification through a separate writ petition when the fact of appointment came out. Had to challenge. To their knowledge no relief could be claimed that was not prayed for

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015

• BASHIR AHMED MUGHAL v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2015 PLD 31
• SHAHID HUSSAIN MALIK v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2015 PLC(CS) 102
• SHAUKAT AZIZ v. ANSAR ALI 2015 PCrLJ 134
• Mst. AMREEN v. MUHAMMAD KABIR 2015 YLR 170
• MUHAMMAD ANAYAT KHAN v. Sardar MUHAMMAD ILTAF KHAN 2015 MLD 330
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. JAVED ANWAR 2015 PLC(CS) 354
• ABDUL LATIF KHAN v. NAZIRAN BEGUM 2015 YLR 427
• Syed NAZIR AHMED SHAH GILLANI v. Syeda NAZIA GILLANI 2015 MLD 443

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2015 →

top advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes