The testimony of Section 9 (c), the definition of evidence of the arrest and smuggling of drug addicts who had a close relationship with the co-accused, did not appear before the Investigation Officer during the investigation, nor did the subpoena statements of the witnesses be taken into account. , When there is no documentary evidence to support the proof of this document. The defense was presented in court when the accused himself did not appear in his witness box to prove his request as the defense witnesses stated that the container had been recovered from the left rear tire of the bus, That would have been possible only if the driver of the vehicle had himself covered the same complaint in the FIR, which clearly indicated the refusal of the passenger to become a minor witness of the bus's sensors recovery memo. Relatives from the area, generally refuse to be witnesses in such cases, suggest anything to record. It was not that the prosecution's witnesses had any animosity or enmity with the accused, the FIR number was very available. On the recovery memo, the trial court, after appreciating the evidence, said it was right that the prosecution had established the restoration of a 14,000kg opium from the secret cavity of the bus operated by the accused prosecution witnesses, even though the anti-narcotic force There were official witnesses, but in the absence of any hostility or hostility, they were good witnesses like other public witnesses, and their testimony could not be excluded or dismissed on the basis that they were present to the witnesses of the force. And the method of recovery was concerned, and their evidence was reliable, reliable and reliable
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
